ꯋꯤꯀꯤꯄꯦꯗꯤꯌꯥ:ꯆꯨꯞꯂꯤ ꯄꯥꯏꯅꯕ ꯍꯪꯒꯠꯆꯕ

ꯋꯤꯀꯤꯄꯦꯗꯤꯌꯥ ꯗꯒꯤ
(ꯋꯤꯀꯤꯄꯦꯗꯤꯌꯥ:Administrators ꯗꯒꯤ ꯑꯃꯨꯛꯍꯟꯂꯛꯄ)

ꯆꯨꯞꯂꯤ ꯄꯥꯏꯅꯕ ꯑꯆꯪꯕ ꯇꯧꯗꯔꯥ ꯌꯥꯗꯔꯕꯁꯤꯡ[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ/ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕꯤ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯆꯦꯟꯒꯗꯕ ꯃꯁꯛꯁꯤꯡ[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

  1. ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ/ꯕꯤ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯌꯥꯝꯗꯔꯕꯗ ꯆꯩꯍꯤ ꯱ ꯍꯦꯟꯅ ꯋꯤꯀꯤꯄꯦꯗꯤꯌꯥ ꯄꯥꯏꯔꯛꯂꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯣꯏꯒꯗꯕꯅꯤ ꯫
  2. ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯗꯨꯒꯤ ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯄ-ꯏꯈꯠꯄ ꯃꯁꯤꯡ ꯱꯰꯰꯰ ꯒꯤ ꯃꯊꯛꯇ ꯂꯩꯒꯗꯕꯅꯤ ꯫
  3. ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯗꯨꯅ ꯆꯩꯍꯤ ꯱ꯒꯤ ꯃꯅꯨꯡꯗ ꯀꯔꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕ ꯱ ꯐꯥꯎꯕ ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯄ-ꯏꯈꯠꯄ ꯇꯧꯗꯔꯕꯗꯤ ꯃꯍꯥꯛꯅ ꯆꯨꯞꯂꯤ ꯄꯥꯏꯔꯤꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯂꯧꯊꯣꯛꯀꯅꯤ ꯫

Criteria for administrator[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

  • User must be active in wikipedia for more than 1 year.
  • Total edit count of the user must be at least 1000.
  • If user do not contribute or inactive for 1 year,user status will be revoked.

ꯚꯣꯠ ꯄꯤꯕꯒꯤ ꯆꯠꯅ ꯀꯥꯡꯂꯣꯟ[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

  • ꯌꯥꯅꯤꯡꯂꯕꯗꯤ ꯌꯥꯢ ꯏꯕꯤꯌꯨ ꯃꯔꯝ ꯄꯤꯕꯤꯕ ꯀꯩꯁꯨ ꯀꯥꯢꯗꯦ꯫
  • ꯌꯥꯅꯤꯡꯗꯔꯕꯗꯤ ꯌꯥꯅꯤꯡꯗꯦ ꯏꯕꯤꯌꯨ ꯃꯔꯝ ꯄꯤꯕꯤꯕ ꯀꯩꯁꯨ ꯀꯥꯏꯗꯦ꯫
  • ꯌꯥꯅꯤꯡꯕꯁꯨ ꯐꯥꯎꯗꯕ ꯌꯥꯅꯤꯡꯗꯕꯁꯨ ꯐꯥꯎꯗꯔꯒꯗꯤ ꯀꯥꯏꯗꯦ ꯏꯕꯤꯌꯨ꯫

Voting rule[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

If a user want to vote in favour simply type Support or ꯌꯥꯢ and may state your reason.
If a user want to vote against simple type Oppose or ꯌꯥꯅꯤꯡꯗꯦ and may state your reason.
user can choose neither to vote in favour nor against the proposal in such case simply type Neutral or ꯀꯥꯏꯗꯦ

ꯍꯧꯖꯤꯛ ꯆꯠꯊꯔꯤꯕ[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

Approved[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


ꯆꯨꯞꯂꯤ ꯄꯥꯏꯅꯕꯍꯣꯠꯅꯔꯤꯕ[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

  • ꯑꯦꯗꯃꯤꯟꯁꯤꯞꯀꯤꯗꯃꯛ ꯑꯦꯄ꯭ꯂꯥꯏ ꯇꯧꯕꯒꯤ ꯃꯔꯝ:

ꯑꯩꯍꯥꯛ ꯋꯤꯀꯤꯄꯦꯗꯤꯌꯥ ꯑꯁꯤꯗ ꯌꯥꯝꯅ ꯁꯥꯡꯂꯕ ꯃꯇꯝꯗꯒꯤ ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠ ꯁꯥꯒꯠꯄꯒꯤ ꯊꯕꯛ ꯇꯧꯗꯨꯅ ꯂꯥꯛꯂꯤ꯫ ꯑꯩꯍꯥꯛꯅ ꯑꯥꯔꯇꯤꯀꯜ ꯀꯌꯥ ꯑꯃ ꯁꯦꯝꯗꯨꯅ ꯂꯥꯛꯂꯤ, ꯇꯦꯝꯄ꯭ꯂꯦꯠꯁꯤꯡ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯄꯦꯖ ꯀꯌꯥ ꯊꯝꯂꯤ, ꯃꯥꯡꯍꯟ-ꯇꯥꯛꯍꯟꯕꯒꯤ ꯊꯕꯛꯁꯤꯡ ꯍꯟꯒꯠꯄ/ꯍꯟꯗꯣꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯊꯕꯛ (ꯔꯤꯚꯔ꯭ꯠ) ꯇꯧꯗꯨꯅ ꯂꯥꯛꯂꯤ꯫ ꯍꯧꯖꯤꯛꯇꯤ, ꯑꯩꯍꯥꯛꯅ ꯃꯇꯤꯛ ꯆꯥꯗꯕ ꯄꯦꯖꯁꯤꯡ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯑꯆꯝꯕ ꯂꯃꯥꯏꯁꯤꯡꯕꯨ ꯉꯥꯛ-ꯁꯦꯟꯕ (ꯄꯦꯖ ꯄ꯭ꯔꯣꯇꯦꯛꯁꯟ), ꯃꯥꯡꯍꯟ-ꯇꯥꯛꯍꯟꯒꯗꯕꯒꯤ ꯊꯕꯛ ꯇꯧꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯁꯤꯡ (ꯚꯦꯟꯗꯥꯜ)ꯕꯨ ꯊꯤꯡꯕ/ꯊꯤꯡꯗꯕ (ꯕ꯭ꯂꯣꯛ/ꯑꯟꯕ꯭ꯂꯣꯛ), ꯃꯇꯤꯛ ꯆꯥꯗꯕ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯃꯇꯤꯛ ꯆꯥꯕ ꯂꯃꯥꯏꯁꯤꯡ ꯂꯧꯊꯣꯛꯄ/ꯂꯧꯊꯣꯛꯇꯕ (ꯗꯤꯂꯤꯠ/ꯑꯟꯗꯤꯂꯤꯠ), ꯑꯁꯤꯅꯆꯤꯡꯕꯗ ꯋꯤꯀꯤꯄꯦꯗꯤꯌꯥ ꯃꯤꯌꯥꯝꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯦꯡ ꯄꯥꯡꯕ ꯄꯥꯝꯃꯤ꯫ -- (ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ) ꯱꯱:꯱꯰, ꯶ ꯐꯦꯕꯨꯋꯥꯔꯤ ꯲꯰꯲꯴ (IST)[ꯄꯥꯎꯈꯨꯝ ꯄꯤꯕ]

  1.  ⧼support⧽ Awangba Mangang (ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ) ꯲꯱:꯰꯴, ꯶ ꯐꯦꯕꯨꯋꯥꯔꯤ ꯲꯰꯲꯴ (IST)[ꯄꯥꯎꯈꯨꯝ ꯄꯤꯕ]
  2.  ⧼support⧽ . Haoreima has done a lot of work in building this wiki and would make good use of the admin tools. Ferien (ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ) ꯲꯱:꯴꯵, ꯱꯲ ꯐꯦꯕꯨꯋꯥꯔꯤ ꯲꯰꯲꯴ (IST)[ꯄꯥꯎꯈꯨꯝ ꯄꯤꯕ]
  3.  ⧼support⧽ Recently, while exploring mniwiki, I came across the contributions of the user on mniwiki and have found out, he is one of the most (if, not the most) active contributors and has the largest number of contributions. He was one of the users advocating this wiki from the incubator and has visions to improve the wiki. Therefore, I believe he is trusted enough to be a parmanent admin. Now, I asked him questions and I am satisfied with the answers. I believe, approving his adminship would boost the improvement of mniwiki. Nokib Sarkar (ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ) ꯲꯲:꯵꯹, ꯱꯴ ꯐꯦꯕꯨꯋꯥꯔꯤ ꯲꯰꯲꯴ (IST)[ꯄꯥꯎꯈꯨꯝ ꯄꯤꯕ]

ꯂꯪꯗꯥꯏ ꯆꯨꯞꯂꯤ ꯄꯥꯏꯅꯕ[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

ꯑꯆꯧꯕ ꯐꯝꯊꯣꯜ[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

ꯄꯨꯁꯤꯟꯂꯛꯅꯕ[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

Question from Nokib Sarkar[ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝ]

Haoreima, I am not active here, but I noticed this RfA and wanted to ask some questions. Feel free tho answer the questions and/or ask for clarifications. Nokib Sarkar (ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ) ꯰꯰:꯵꯴, ꯸ ꯐꯦꯕꯨꯋꯥꯔꯤ ꯲꯰꯲꯴ (IST)[ꯄꯥꯎꯈꯨꯝ ꯄꯤꯕ]

  1. There is an admin on mniwiki already, Why do you think mniwiki needs another administrator?
  2. What would be your policy about blocking another fellow administrator?
@Nokib Sarkar Thank you for your questions!
  1. There is only one administrator in mni wiki as of now. We are grateful to him for carrying out all the administrative tasks of this wiki all alone since this wiki's inception. But, if this single admin suddenly becomes inactive or takes a wikibreak due to certain reasons, then all the administrative tasks of this wiki need to be postponed. Another reason is that, if his account is somehow compromised, then there would be no one to do administrative activities in this wiki. And therefore, I believe that it will be safe to have a backup as well as collaboration.
  2. An administrator will be blocked if he/she commits disruptive activities, violating wikipedia policies and guidelines repeatedly, even after sufficient warnings and notifications. For such case, blocking him/her would not be my individual decision. For such case, I will discuss the matter with the wikipedia community in the public community portal, before carrying out any action, to ensure neutrality, justice and equality, in adherence to wikipedia policies and guidelines.
-- (ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ) ꯰꯲:꯴꯳, ꯸ ꯐꯦꯕꯨꯋꯥꯔꯤ ꯲꯰꯲꯴ (IST)[ꯄꯥꯎꯈꯨꯝ ꯄꯤꯕ]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.